by PorkChop » Dec 20, '15, 8:21 pm
I do understand the problems with the last scene, I felt it was a little weird as well.
The scene is kind of brilliant, but also confusing. We're led to believe that the real monster is the repressed grief over her husband's death, which she shows she's got under control now as it's locked in the basement. She's also celebrating her son's birthday for the first time, rather than morning the death of her husband. I thought this was a good way to wrap things up.
I didn't get a few things about the final scene though. Is the monster actually a physical thing now? They collected worms to feed it with, and there were about 5 bolts on the door to ensure the monster doesn't escape. Throughout the film we're led to believe the monster is purely psychological, but this is quite confusing. If it is purely psychological, what is the act of feeding it worms supposed to represent? Another thing is that the bowl of worms moves on its own, towards the monster. Does this mean the mother is still experiencing visual/auditory hallucinations?
The final scene really blurred the lines between the physical and psychological, and I don't think it was a good idea. Leaving the monster as a psychological phenomenon would've been much better way to end the film.