It is currently: Oct 07, '25, 5:16 am |
Moderator: Str8Shooter
There are reports going around online that "Ashley from Human Resources" on last night's WWE RAW in Buffalo may have been a real WWE employee.
The Director of WWE Human Resources is actually a woman named Ashley Osterrieder and she's been with the company since 2014. However, this was not the same woman that was on RAW last night, according to a source in WWE.
Furthermore, our NXT correspondent Tara sent word that she attended a WWE HR event at Full Sail University last June that was hosted by Ashley, and that is not the same woman who was on RAW last night.
Viazon wrote:Did you have to down vote me three times, one time each? Couldn't you have just down voted me three points at only one time?
I know it doesn't make a difference but it just seems like a waste of time on your behalf.
Viazon wrote:He was wrong though. I wasn't objectifying women.
SlightlyJames wrote:Meltzer said that apparently that "anonymous complaint" angle was actually something that really happened, and they were shitting on it on screen because y'know, WWE.
Viazon wrote:I was merely implying this lady was attractive enough for me to want to have sex with her. I don't see how that's objectifying. I'm still acknowledging her as a woman. If I had said, "I'd hit that" or "I'd smash it" I could understand. That would be seeing the woman as an object. As you can see, I called her "she".
Did I say it in a crude manner? Perhaps. But so what? No need to get all butt hurt about it. I was just joking anyway. Not about her attractiveness, but the way I said. I figured us lot have known each other so long that we would be able to make jokes about such things. The sort of things you say between friends but don't actually mean. It's why you say these things between friends and not to strangers. Because friends know you are just messing around. Don't get me wrong, I don't give a shit about the rep points. Down vote me all you want. But when you do it, at least do it for an actual good reason.
I like you guys, but seriously. Starting to get a little bit too sensitive in your old ages. Get a sense of humour.
Everlong wrote:Apparently it was based on the stuff with Bill DeMott.
Viazon wrote:I was merely implying this lady was attractive enough for me to want to have sex with her. I don't see how that's objectifying. I'm still acknowledging her as a woman. If I had said, "I'd hit that" or "I'd smash it" I could understand. That would be seeing the woman as an object. As you can see, I called her "she".
Did I say it in a crude manner? Perhaps. But so what? No need to get all butt hurt about it. I was just joking anyway. Not about her attractiveness, but the way I said. I figured us lot have known each other so long that we would be able to make jokes about such things. The sort of things you say between friends but don't actually mean. It's why you say these things between friends and not to strangers. Because friends know you are just messing around. Don't get me wrong, I don't give a shit about the rep points. Down vote me all you want. But when you do it, at least do it for an actual good reason.
I like you guys, but seriously. Starting to get a little bit too sensitive in your old ages. Get a sense of humour.
The Legend wrote:I also like you saying at the start of the post by saying I wasn't objectifying her, and then following it by saying I was just... and then giving the basic word for word definition of objectifying that was humorous for me to read.
Str8Shooter wrote:For fucks sake, are people actually pissed about Viazon objectifying women? I can't even tell if people are joking anymore on here half the time.
Regardless, this thread went from in good fun to people actually getting pissed. This is why the rep system is dumb anyway, all it does is cause problems.
Str8Shooter wrote:For fucks sake, are people actually pissed about Viazon objectifying women? I can't even tell if people are joking anymore on here half the time.
SlightlyJames wrote:Str8Shooter wrote:For fucks sake, are people actually pissed about Viazon objectifying women? I can't even tell if people are joking anymore on here half the time.
Regardless, this thread went from in good fun to people actually getting pissed. This is why the rep system is dumb anyway, all it does is cause problems.
I'm honestly not seeing where anyone is angry dude. Viazon seems a bit flustered at the neg rep but that's the extent of it.
31 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests