Now the real drama begins, cus you KNOW Brady is taking this to court. His camp has already said they would.
This is gonna be juicy.
It is currently: Oct 22, '25, 4:19 am |
Moderator: Everlong
Patriots owner Robert Kraft went back on the attack against the NFL and apologized to fans for accepting the league’s punishment by commissioner Roger Goodell.
“The decision handed down by the league yesterday, is unfathomable to me,” Kraft said during an impromptu six minute appearance at the scheduled press conference for Patriots head coach Bill Belichick. “It is routine for discipline in the NFL to be reduced upon appeal. In the vast majority of these cases, there’s tangible and hard evidence for the infraction for which the discipline is being imposed and still the initial penalty gets reduced. Six months removed from the AFC Championship game, the league still has no hard evidence of anybody doing anything to tamper with the PSI levels of footballs.
“I continue to believe and unequivocally support Tom Brady. I first and foremost need to apologize to our fans, because I truly believe what I did in May, given the actual evidence of the situation and the league’s history on discipline matters, would make it much easier for the league to exonerate Tom Brady.
“Unfortunately, I was wrong.”
Kraft said he regrets accepting the NFL’s punishment levied on the team that included a $1 million fine and a two draft picks.
“I was willing to accept the harshest penalty in the history of the NFL for an alleged ball violation because I believed it would help exonerate Tom [Brady],” Kraft said. “… Once again, I want to apologize to the fans of the New England Patriots and to Tom Brady, I was wrong to put my faith in the league. Given the facts, evidence, and laws of science that underscore this entire situation, it is completely incomprehensible to me that the league continues to take steps to disparage one of its all-time great players, and a man for whom I have the utmost respect....
“I have come to the conclusion that this was never about doing what was fair and just. Back in May, I had to make a difficult decision that I now regret. I tried to do what I thought was right. I chose not to take legal action. I wanted to return the focus to football.”
In accepting the league’s penalty, Kraft had hoped it would help exonerate Brady.
“I acted in good faith and was optimistic that by taking the actions I took the league would have what they wanted,” Kraft said. “I was willing to accept the harshest penalty in the history of the NFL for an alleged ball violation because I believed it would help exonerate Tom. I have often said, ‘If you want to get a deal done, sometimes you have to get the lawyers out of the room.’ I had hoped that Tom Brady’s appeal to the league would provide Roger Goodell the necessary explanation to overturn his suspension. Now, the league has taken the matter to court, which is a tactic that only a lawyer would recommend.”
Kraft, who said this would be the last time he would speak on the matter this season, reflected back on how the league has handled the saga that has dragged on for six months.
“The league’s handling of this entire process has been extremely frustrating and disconcerting,” Kraft said. “I will never understand why an initial erroneous report regarding the PSI level of footballs was leaked by a source from the NFL a few days after the AFC championship game, [and] was never corrected by those who had the correct information. For four months, that report cast aspersions and shaped public opinion.”
Kraft took specific offense to how the story of Brady getting a new phone was communicated in Tuesday’s ruling by Goodell.
“Yesterday’s decision by commissioner was released in a similar manner, under an erroneous headline that read, ‘Tom Brady destroyed his cellphone.’” Kraft said. “This headline was designed to capture headlines across the country and obscure evidence regarding the tampering of air pressure in footballs. It intentionally implied nefarious behavior and minimized the acknowledgement that Tom provided the history of every number he texted during that relevant time frame. And we had already provided the league with every cellphone of every non-NFLPA that they requested, including head coach Bill Belichick.”
Everlong wrote:Wow, huge bomb dropped today. It's been revealed that the source of the leak of Mortensen's false report, in which he wrote that 11 of 12 balls were deflated by 2 pounds of air each (a report which turned out to be COMPLETELY FALSE), was Mike Kensil, the NFL's VP of Game Operations.
Why is this big news? Basically, this guy has a history of animosity towards the Pats and Belichick (he was the Jets president when Belichick resigned as HC after a couple days to take the Patriots job). He deliberately supplied false information which shaped public and media perception and cast the pats as liars and cheaters (a narrative the general public was happy to accept) and in doing so caused a $5 million dollar investigation and this entire debacle.
The more and more that comes out about this case, the more it looks like Tom Brady and the Patriots are getting completely railroaded and that there's a big league agenda behind all of this. And why would anyone trust the league at all at this point after the way they've completely bungled other big-time situations in the last couple years?
@Messiah @The Legend @DanielsonTHAGOAT @UTK @Philip Rivers what you all think about this?
To people who think this is about deflating footballs still, you're nuts. There are multiple precedents that will be set if Brady's suspension is upheld, none of which are good for teams or players:
1) Suspension for not handing over a cellphone during / obstructing an NFL / Independent investigation (never been done before. People have flat out lied in preliminary questioning and not been suspended)
2) Suspension for being generally aware that someone else is doing something illegal (never been done before. See; Bountygate, all of defense was "generally aware" and few were punished)
3) Ability of the NFL to pull Attorney Client Privilege on an independent investigation and hide the investigative files from the team/player (in both Bountygate and Rice, the players/teams were given access to investigative files)
UTK wrote:I don't get how this wasn't revealed during the investigation.
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests