Seth Rollins or Dean Ambrose?

[Circled Square]

Who do you prefer?

[Messiah]

Seth Rollins.

I like Ambrose a lot and feel the WWE wasted the momentum he had picked up. But I think Rollins has a lot more star power and is a much better wrestler. I'm not that big of a fan of Ambrose in the ring, personally. Actually find him quite repetitive.

[EmperorWu]

King Rollins by far. I started turning on Ambrose the second he got too cartoony, it's not for me.

[Hanley!]

Seth Rollins is better across the board. Ambrose might be able to rival him on mic work if he had better material, but I haven't heard any great promos from him since he joined the WWE. Rollins is way ahead of him in the ring though (along with most of the rest of the roster). His look is better, his character at the moment is much easier to get into.

Ambrose is good. He has loads of potential. But we're really not seeing what he can do. He's never allowed to pick up a win, and his promo material is at times excruciatingly bad. His ring work is a bit repetitive, but he's pretty good and if he was to get a good singles match on pay per view against a talented wrestler, as a part of a feud that made sense then I'm sure he could show us more. But the feud with Rollins never gave us that great match in the end - the Hell in a Cell match was marred by overbooking and interference. The Wyatt feud was terrible from start to finish.

Even if both were pushed to their fullest potential, I doubt I would like Ambrose as much as Rollins, but at the moment there's no competition.

[KaiserGlider]

Ambrose is better on the mic, Seth is better in the ring, however Seth is more of a total package so I'd give it to him at the moment. The way their respective pushes have gone since October certainly doesn't help Dean either, unfortunately.

[DBSoT]

I still think Ambrose has more potential, but Rollins' booking has been so much better that he comes across on a much bigger talent level. If i had to rank attributes, I would say that Ambrose is better on the mic and has more charisma, but Rollins is the better wrestler and he has shown the ability to play an amazing heel. It can not be overstated that Rollins is very popular, but continues to garner great heat from crowds. That is an amazing feat in today's WWE.

[Westcoastvibes]

If you judge by their wwe careers the rollins is an easy choice. I think ambros has been shelved for a future run after the shield split in favor of rollins and reigns though. I am not a follower of eithers pre wwe work, looking at what i have seen i think ambros has the potential to be big, but i dont think he will be huge, chris benoit/eddie Guerrero level. Someone wwe can use now and again to be the top guy because the fans can get behind him easily. Rollins I see as the next Randy Orton, he can garner massive heat fast if needed and he can carry a match with anyone if needed. Rollins will be a bigger star overall if he does not do something stupid, i can see rollins being the type of guy to leave over contract issues and thinking it would actually hurt wwe by leaving.

[Kyle]

Rollins, although that may change if WWE used Ambrose better. Right now Seth is about the only guy they are using well.

[Stolenmeat]

I'd rather watch Rollins wrestle, the guy makes it look pretty effortless.