The Legend wrote:SortaCreative wrote:AkydefGoldberg wrote:Have to say completely agree Sky's point of view and it's a BIG oversight by the WWE really.
I wouldn't agree with Sky. Sky are really anti competition when it comes to contracting sporting events and entertainment. It's only been recently that BT Sport has been able to make a dent in their total monopoly of everything sporting related in the country. Or atleast Football and Rugby related.
Why the hell would you want to agree with Sky holding exclusivity over everything, when competition (in theory) would benefit us as consumers. Imagine if Virgin, BT and Sky all had to compete to get your hard earned money for the sports you like to watch.
But if Sky pays for that exclusivity they deserve it then. Each of those companies could have done the same thing, but they didn't.
I'm not saying they don't deserve it if they pay for it.
I'm saying I dont like they're in the position to be able to out bid the others to get such exclusivity or that a company like WWE would be that retarded to give it to them when they've got plans for a Network.
Clearly the entire company views the rest of the world as an after thought and it's bullshit. It bothers me that they want us to care so much when they really don't give a fuck about us - from a business perspective. I have money. They want my money. I've enjoyed their product over the years. I would be willing to give them my money directly. I can't because they lack the foresight to make any sensible business decisions.
That doesn't even begin to cover the fact that the product is so pro USA it's cringe worthy and that they constantly insult views who buy PPV's via other means on air, during the broadcast they most likely just paid for.