PorkChop wrote:WWE are one of the most badly run companies I can think of. Genuinely.
Worse than TNA?

It is currently: Oct 20, '25, 4:17 pm |
Moderator: Str8Shooter
PorkChop wrote:WWE are one of the most badly run companies I can think of. Genuinely.
Twister wrote:PorkChop wrote:WWE are one of the most badly run companies I can think of. Genuinely.
Worse than TNA?
Str8Shooter wrote:Are you guys at least getting the full version of the Network?
Because if so, you're still ahead of us in Canada, where we get a stripped down, messed up version where there's barely any classic stuff at all and you're forced to pay 11.99 for a TV channel that airs the stuff, which isn't even available in half the country.
prophet wrote:@Twister - hope you don't mind but I thought I'd tweak the title of this thread to better reflect what has happened
What an absolute joke. Final nail in the coffin for me, I wasn't overly keen on getting the network anyway but now I could give a fuck - the way they've handled this has been appalling.
AkydefGoldberg wrote:Nice way to warm relations with the UK fans ahead of a tour...
You'd expect this sort of a dick move by TNA tbh.
AkydefGoldberg wrote:Have to say completely agree Sky's point of view and it's a BIG oversight by the WWE really.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests