Awww hell yeah.
It is currently: Oct 22, '25, 10:55 am |
PorkChop wrote:Looks alright, I still can't shake off the doubts as to whether it'll be any good though.
Str8Shooter wrote:PorkChop wrote:Looks alright, I still can't shake off the doubts as to whether it'll be any good though.
There's a 95% chance people will bitch incessantly about it for years after it comes out.
Romo wrote:Is Benedict Cumberbatch still claiming he's not in it?
Str8Shooter wrote:There's a 95% chance people will bitch incessantly about it for years after it comes out.
Hanley! wrote:Str8Shooter wrote:Oh, we also learned (already) that these films will be shot better than the prequels, but I don't think that was ever in doubt.
Matteo wrote:Hanley! wrote:Str8Shooter wrote:Oh, we also learned (already) that these films will be shot better than the prequels, but I don't think that was ever in doubt.
Portions of the film will also be shot on Kodak Vision3 250D 5207 65mm film stock (accompanied by the amazing IMAX MSM cameras and Hasselblad lenses), so it will be the most technically impressive of all Star Wars films. And yes, vastly superior to the prequel trilogy, which, in all honestly, used equipment that was in its technological infancy. The film will also be distributed to specific theatres for IMAX 70mm projection (much like Interstellar this year), so I'm assuming the most hardcore of Star Wars films will see it in its definitive print and format. And it should be amazing, theatrically.
Even though a project like this goes through such a heavy digital intermediate process, I'm still glad J.J. Abrams is espousing photochemical film as the way to go. There's still something organically beautiful to it, even if this film will ultimately be edited, colour graded, and rendered digitally. A project with this amount of resources and money will get the most out of what contemporary photochemical film can produce, and that's an amazingly exciting thought.
UTK wrote:Romo wrote:Is Benedict Cumberbatch still claiming he's not in it?
It doesn't really sound like him that much. More likely that it's Max von Sydow, who's actually supposed to be in it.
PorkChop wrote:Matteo wrote:Hanley! wrote:Str8Shooter wrote:Oh, we also learned (already) that these films will be shot better than the prequels, but I don't think that was ever in doubt.
Portions of the film will also be shot on Kodak Vision3 250D 5207 65mm film stock (accompanied by the amazing IMAX MSM cameras and Hasselblad lenses), so it will be the most technically impressive of all Star Wars films. And yes, vastly superior to the prequel trilogy, which, in all honestly, used equipment that was in its technological infancy. The film will also be distributed to specific theatres for IMAX 70mm projection (much like Interstellar this year), so I'm assuming the most hardcore of Star Wars films will see it in its definitive print and format. And it should be amazing, theatrically.
Even though a project like this goes through such a heavy digital intermediate process, I'm still glad J.J. Abrams is espousing photochemical film as the way to go. There's still something organically beautiful to it, even if this film will ultimately be edited, colour graded, and rendered digitally. A project with this amount of resources and money will get the most out of what contemporary photochemical film can produce, and that's an amazingly exciting thought.
But the big question is... have you actually watched Star Wars yet?
I remember you saying that you had no interest in watching it, which is a shame as it's easily the most legendary film saga of all time.
18 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests