It is currently: May 14, '24, 8:19 pm |
Moderator: Str8Shooter
Hanley! wrote:The weirdest thing about the WWE's main roster is that despite it being the biggest platform in wrestling, it's also where wrestlers go to stop being over. Aleister Black winning the Rumble wouldn't be ridiculous, because he'd automatically be more over than 95% of the rest of the roster. But six months later, chances are nobody would care about him. How many guys are more popular or seen as bigger stars on WWE's main roster than they were in NXT or Japan or the indies? It's actually the opposite in almost every single case, which is really bizarre. Raw and Smackdown can't get stars over - they just take stars that are already over and erode that popularity gradually. That's a real sign that the product is shitty right now.
The Legend wrote:I think an underrated reason for this might be just how large RAW and SD are. They are high volume with huge rosters and spread themselves in so many directions that the shows wind up losing focus.
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests