It is currently: Apr 20, '24, 6:57 am |
Locke wrote:Well, the rest of the internet got the joke. Glad to see you're fun at parties.
VaderBomb wrote:I watched this last week. What a smugly ironic, self-aware piece of shit.
You can't just throw a bunch of 80s cliches together and assume that it will work as a film. I'm so glad that this schmuck didn't get his full budget.
2/10 at best.
UTK wrote:VaderBomb wrote:I watched this last week. What a smugly ironic, self-aware piece of shit.
You can't just throw a bunch of 80s cliches together and assume that it will work as a film. I'm so glad that this schmuck didn't get his full budget.
2/10 at best.
What? What about this seemed smug? This was just fun. I'd say half the films you post about are smug.
UTK wrote:VaderBomb wrote:I watched this last week. What a smugly ironic, self-aware piece of shit.
You can't just throw a bunch of 80s cliches together and assume that it will work as a film. I'm so glad that this schmuck didn't get his full budget.
2/10 at best.
I'd say half the films you post about are smug.
UTK wrote:The point is this movie was just a ton of fun. Over the top maybe, but not smug. But a lot of the arthouse-type films you post about cone across as hella smug. Even talking about them comes across as smug sometimes.
48 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests