by Hanley! » Jan 23, '14, 5:31 pm
Orton could lose the title to Cena though, which would make Batista winning the Rumble pointless. So I don't think it's definitely him.
It shouldn't be anyway, Batista has only headlined Wrestlemania once and for good reason. He needed that excellent story to make him look like a true headliner. He just doesn't have the skills or the popularity to be in THAT spot.
At the moment though, only Punk or Batista seem capable of winning. Or an unnamed competitor. But how many unnamed competitors could even win it? Lesnar or Bryan would make sense. Or Undertaker, conceivably, but I doubt they'd do that. They'll keep their title match separate from their streak match at Wrestlemania. Sheamus could return at the Rumble, but there's no way he'll win - if they were going to give it to a returning vanilla babyface that doesn't deserve to be in the Wrestlemania main event, they'd just give it to Batista.
It's really hard to call. This Wrestlemania is weird, because I don't think there are any matches people are anticipating or really dying to see. There's nothing that seems like an obvious match to book, there's no real investment in any feud in particular. They've done a bad job of making it seem like the culmination of a year's booking.
I still think Bryan has a chance of winning, because if there's anything the fans are really behind at the moment it's him.