It is currently: Oct 21, '25, 4:15 pm

WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Come introduce yourself, have a drink and talk about anything! This is the place for any and all off-topic conversations.

WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Everlong » May 03, '15, 1:02 pm

http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015 ... ce-william

Come on people get on your A Game we have a new member of the royal family this is important shit
  • 0

Image

Image

YOU HEARD IT FROM TAJ FIRST FOLKS
User avatar
Everlong Male
SquaredCircle Commisioner
Living Legend
Living Legend
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Topic Author
Posts: 10545
Topics: 2439
Age: 37
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Brew City, USA
Reputation: 3827

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby SlightlyJames » May 03, '15, 1:22 pm

Everlong wrote:this is important shit

Image
  • 1

Image
User avatar
SlightlyJames Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2994
Topics: 275
Age: 32
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Glasgow
Reputation: 1424

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Circled Square » May 03, '15, 1:22 pm

With the level of incest in the Royal Family I'm surprised it wasn't born with one eye and club foot.
  • 0

User avatar
Circled Square Male
Next Big Thing
Next Big Thing
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 1869
Topics: 209
Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015
Reputation: 572

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby prophet » May 03, '15, 7:18 pm

Because nobody gives a shit about the royal family...

...at least not in the North.
  • 5

User avatar
prophet Male
Creative Team
Main Eventer
Main Eventer
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 4061
Topics: 534
Age: 30
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Yorkshire, England
Reputation: 1401
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Daz » May 03, '15, 8:58 pm

prophet wrote:Because nobody gives a shit about the royal family...

...at least not in the North.


Or the south, east or west. Only the tourists in London seem to give a toss and even then, it's mostly just pretending to give a toss so you can get interviewed on telly.
  • 0

Image
Click image to get your tits blown off by my literary prowess.
User avatar
Daz Male
Referee
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2885
Topics: 25
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1382

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Everlong » May 03, '15, 9:09 pm

Question: is it really that nobody actually cares about them? Because it seems like the whole Nickelback kind of scenario where "everybody" hates them, and yet they're absurdly popular.
  • 0

Image

Image

YOU HEARD IT FROM TAJ FIRST FOLKS
User avatar
Everlong Male
SquaredCircle Commisioner
Living Legend
Living Legend
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Topic Author
Posts: 10545
Topics: 2439
Age: 37
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Brew City, USA
Reputation: 3827

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Daz » May 03, '15, 9:18 pm

Everlong wrote:Question: is it really that nobody actually cares about them? Because it seems like the whole Nickelback kind of scenario where "everybody" hates them, and yet they're absurdly popular.


I don't think anyone actively hates them, well maybe some people, who resent the whole "lining their pockets with our tax money" stuff. It's just that they're figureheads at this point, and don't really have any real purpose. They're essentially just a tourist attraction. So stuff like this, and news reports, the absurd talk of the new baby being fourth in line to the throne and all that malarkey, doesn't really have any bearing.

The only thing I think when I see the Royals is that Prince William looks like Ryan Getzlaf ... with a little more hair.
  • 0

Last edited by Daz on May 03, '15, 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Click image to get your tits blown off by my literary prowess.
User avatar
Daz Male
Referee
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2885
Topics: 25
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1382

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby SlightlyJames » May 03, '15, 9:28 pm

Everlong wrote:Question: is it really that nobody actually cares about them? Because it seems like the whole Nickelback kind of scenario where "everybody" hates them, and yet they're absurdly popular.


They're government funded celebrities. Why would anyone give a single solitary fuck other than being irritated we pay for their shit?
  • 1

Image
User avatar
SlightlyJames Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2994
Topics: 275
Age: 32
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Glasgow
Reputation: 1424

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Westcoastvibes » May 03, '15, 10:39 pm

SlightlyJames wrote:
Everlong wrote:Question: is it really that nobody actually cares about them? Because it seems like the whole Nickelback kind of scenario where "everybody" hates them, and yet they're absurdly popular.


They're government funded celebrities. Why would anyone give a single solitary fuck other than being irritated we pay for their shit?


I dont pay for there shit, and i dont give a fuck about the royal baby either. Congrats on a new child but yeah, who gives a shit.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
Westcoastvibes Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2083
Topics: 98
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Mexico Uhmurica (a.k.a. - Arizona)
Reputation: 523

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Viazon » May 04, '15, 2:34 am

This baby will never run the country. No one cares.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
Viazon Male
Main Eventer
Main Eventer
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 3504
Topics: 244
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013
Location: Bedford, England
Reputation: 980

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby AkydefGoldberg » May 04, '15, 11:46 am

Yup, me no care.

Always fun to see Kay Burley and the rest of the TV Royal Correspondents waiting with baited breath for any snippet of news so are left interviewing any random person with a small opinion to kill off time...
  • 0

User avatar
AkydefGoldberg Male
Main Eventer
Main Eventer
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 4850
Topics: 520
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013
Reputation: 662

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Daz » May 04, '15, 11:58 am

AkydefGoldberg wrote:Yup, me no care.

Always fun to see Kay Burley and the rest of the TV Royal Correspondents waiting with baited breath for any snippet of news so are left interviewing any random person with a small opinion to kill off time...


And those people have been camping out on the streets (because they're actually homeless) and have the worst teeth known to man.
  • 0

Image
Click image to get your tits blown off by my literary prowess.
User avatar
Daz Male
Referee
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2885
Topics: 25
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1382

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Locke » May 04, '15, 12:28 pm

prophet wrote:Because nobody gives a shit about the royal family...

...at least not in the North.


THE NORTH REMEMB--uh.. The North forgot.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
Locke Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2652
Topics: 137
Age: 12
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: USA
Reputation: 544

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby SortaCreative » May 04, '15, 2:17 pm

I kind of care. In a historical context.

I'd like it if we didn't pay for their lives but... eh. It's an important part of British and English history. It's what little culture and identity this country has. I don't really hate it, I don't see why anyone else hates it. They contribute in a small sense in terms of tourism.
  • 1

Image
Irin
SortaCreative Male
Next Big Thing
Next Big Thing
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 1560
Topics: 54
Age: 38
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: England, UK
Reputation: 1211
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Str8Shooter » May 04, '15, 2:38 pm

What I got from this thread is that Brits hate babies.
  • 0

User avatar
Str8Shooter Male
Creative Team
Main Eventer
Main Eventer
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 3896
Topics: 359
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Reputation: 1477

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Viazon » May 04, '15, 2:41 pm

No one cares when someone had a second kid. The novelty has alreay worn off.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
Viazon Male
Main Eventer
Main Eventer
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 3504
Topics: 244
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013
Location: Bedford, England
Reputation: 980

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Viazon » May 04, '15, 2:41 pm

No one cares when someone had a second kid. The novelty has alreay worn off.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
Viazon Male
Main Eventer
Main Eventer
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 3504
Topics: 244
Age: 39
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013
Location: Bedford, England
Reputation: 980

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Daz » May 04, '15, 2:41 pm

Str8Shooter wrote:What I got from this thread is that Brits hate babies.


Which means British Babies hate themselves, which is the most British thing of all.
  • 3

Image
Click image to get your tits blown off by my literary prowess.
User avatar
Daz Male
Referee
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2885
Topics: 25
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1382

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Everlong » May 04, '15, 2:46 pm

Str8Shooter wrote:What I got from this thread is that Brits hate babies.


To be fair Daz just hates pretty much everyone :P
  • 1

Image

Image

YOU HEARD IT FROM TAJ FIRST FOLKS
User avatar
Everlong Male
SquaredCircle Commisioner
Living Legend
Living Legend
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Topic Author
Posts: 10545
Topics: 2439
Age: 37
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Brew City, USA
Reputation: 3827

Re: WHY NO ROYAL BABY THREADS

Postby Daz » May 04, '15, 2:55 pm

Everlong wrote:
Str8Shooter wrote:What I got from this thread is that Brits hate babies.


To be fair Daz just hates pretty much everyone :P


Truth.
  • 0

Image
Click image to get your tits blown off by my literary prowess.
User avatar
Daz Male
Referee
Ring General
Ring General
 
12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership12 years of membership
 
Posts: 2885
Topics: 25
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1382

 

Next

Return to The Pub

Who is Online Now?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

Reputation System ©'