Everlong wrote:The Legend wrote:There is no scientific way for those balls to have been deflated that much naturally. Therefore, if you remove all things impossible, you are left with what's possible.
Dude, nobody's denying the balls were deflated. I'm saying that
a) There's STILL no conclusive evidence to put the Patriots organization at all behind this and
b) Even if there was, it's not a big deal in the least. Like there aren't enough words for me to emphasize how not big of a deal this is.
a) There's no scientific way for the footballs to deflate that much in the time talked about. If it can't happen naturally, it has to happen unnaturally. Therefore the team was behind the balls being deflated.
b) If it makes no difference, why did that Patriots do it? If it's no big deal and doesn't offer the team any advantage on the field why break the rule and risk this situation? It obviously makes a difference at some point.
Now did it cause them to win the AFC Championship game? No, probably not. Was this the only game this season or any other season that they deflated balls? Probably not. you wouldn't just decide to do something like this and change the balls in a way for such an important game if you didn't know it provided you an advantage.
The Patriots wound up with home field advantage over the Broncos due to tiebreakers as both teams finished at 12-4. The Patriots won three regular season games by one touchdown or less. The Wells Report indicates on multiple occasions that these employees and Brady were in communication about doing similar things throughout the regular season. Now in those games, I don't think you can totally say that the illegal balls wouldn't help them enough to win those games where they might not have won with regulation balls. Maybe a Brady pass goes off target. Maybe it get's tipped. Maybe a heavier ball does fly as far on a deep pass causing it to be picked off. Maybe a receiver doesn't catch a key pass because a firmer ball is harder to catch. Maybe a running back fumbles because a firmer ball is harder to hold onto. Maybe Brady loses grip on a firmer ball.
We'll never know because the Patriots cheated. But what if they didn't cheat and one of those games goes the other way. That would have totally changed the AFC playoff picture. Now instead of being a 12-4 team that holds the #1 seed the Patriots are an 11-5 team that's tied for the second through fourth seed in the AFC with the Steelers and Colts. Due to the AFC conference record the Patriots would have actually slipped all the way to the fourth seed with a conference record of 8-4.
Now instead of a first round bye the Patriots play the Bengals in the first round. The Pats likely win that game, but it's another game against a physical football team that increases the chances of injury and other things. But for the sake of argument let's say the Pats advance unscathed from the game and advance. In the Divisional Round, instead of getting to play the Ravens at home, New England has to travel to either Denver or Pittsburgh (the new top two seeds) depending on what happens in the Ravens @ Colts new Wild Card Weekend match up created by the team re-shuffling thanks to the Patriots new record. I don't think it's automatic that you can say they survive either of those opponents. And even if they do they would have needed to survive the next one the week following.
Can you honestly say that the Patriots under inflating footballs couldn't have possibly had some bearing somewhere throughout the season on how the AFC playoffs were shaped and how they turned out? I really, seriously doubt you could possibly say that without a doubt breaking those rules had no impact on the Patriots being the representative in the Super Bowl and thereby winning the Super Bowl.
Now, I certainly feel bad for the two poor scapegoats that Belichick, Brady and Kraft have shoved in front of the Patriots team bus to get run over, backed over and run over again.