Circled Square wrote:UTK wrote:The Legend wrote:America definitely has a problem. We have far too many citizens that want to do other people harm or kill them. Gun control says let's treat the symptom and make it as hard as possible for those people to kill others. I'm saying it's much more logical to say, we have a problem. too many people want to do others harm. How do we lessen the amount of people that want to do others harm? When you find an answer to that question you will make a true difference in lessening the amount of crime and killings and until you address that question then anything you do is just putting a band-aid on a bullet wound.
The thing about that analogy is, unless you bandage a wound or put pressure on it somehow, you'll bleed out. I guess we're bleeding out?
You won't lessen the amount of people that want to do others harm, you're making it more difficult for them to do others harm.
Why isn't that a good thing?
Why should a gaping hole in the mental health system going to be fixed by taking away people's gun rights?
You know gun control doesn't mean "let's take away everybody's guns" right? Most people don't want to "take away people's gun rights". I personally like the idea of mandatory, federal background checks. The fact that it's so easy to purchase a firearm is what bugs me. You don't have to be a bleeding heart liberal to want only sane people owning guns.
A report last year showed that the state-wide background checks in effect around the nation had kept over 2 million firearms out of the wrong hands. What are the "wrong hands"? Anyone who:
-Has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
-Is under indictment for a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;
-Is a fugitive from justice;
-Is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance;
-Has been adjudicated as a mental defective or committed to a mental institution;
-Is illegally or unlawfully in the United States;
-Has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;
-Having been a citizen of the United States, has renounced U.S. citizenship;
-Is subject to a court order that restrains the person from harassing, stalking, or threatening an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner;
-Has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence
I'm sure we agree that these people should certainly not own firearms? Background checks help make sure many of them do not. I think there should be a mandatory mental health screening as well, because I suppose an insane person who was never actually committed could hypothetically purchase one as long as they are not any of those other things.
But passing a law like that on the federal level would be gun control. No responsible and sane gun owner will be affected. But since it would be "gun control", everybody would freak out and lock their AA-12s in their safe.