It is currently: May 11, '24, 9:36 pm |
Moderator: Str8Shooter
Str8Shooter wrote:Nobody at Mania wants to see the Rock get the shit kicked out of him by the 3 Wyatts, or Steve Austin eat a Brogue Kick though. That crowd went apeshit for those guys kicking ass and taking names. That's what they paid to see.
Sorry, I just can't see some casual fan watching Mania with his buddies for the first time in 5 years seeing Bray Wyatt and Braun Stroman manhandling The Rock and leaving him laying and saying "Dudes, can I come over tomorrow to see these guys do this to someone else?". They're more likely to say "What the hell was that? I wanted to see someone eat a Rock Bottom".
The Legend wrote:BUT, adding one more day of it does do damage to them. One more day on the biggest stage of them all when you've got a lot of casual viewers that could possibly see something in a new act other than being jobbed out to some old time part time nostalgia act, that could catch those people's attention.
Everlong wrote:The Legend wrote:BUT, adding one more day of it does do damage to them. One more day on the biggest stage of them all when you've got a lot of casual viewers that could possibly see something in a new act other than being jobbed out to some old time part time nostalgia act, that could catch those people's attention.
They've got literally the entire rest of the show and all the matches to see something in a new act. These appearances outside of matches are entirely fan service specifically for nostalgic fans. It'd defeat the purpose to have The Rock come out in a one-off appearance and get beat down by someone the "casuals" are unfamiliar with.
WWE should be getting the casual fans interested with appearances like Rock's and KEEPING them interested in the rest of the show by presenting a great product and having new wrestlers go over and be built up. But they don't do that, they rely solely on the appearances and nostalgia without adding that little extra something to keep the casuals coming back for more.
There's a time and a place in wrestling for nostalgia, and it ABSOLUTELY is WrestleMania.
Everlong wrote:It'd defeat the purpose to have The Rock come out in a one-off appearance and get beat down by someone the "casuals" are unfamiliar with.
Hanley! wrote:It wasn't a small minority of fans. A lot of people thought this went too long and were ultimately turned off by it.
The Legend wrote:Are you telling me Kevin Owens couldn't have benefited from having a positive interaction with the Rock for himself?
Westcoastvibes wrote:If he would have sold an ass whooping from the wyatts with bray standing over his lifeless body before the white night came out to save him then the segment would have accomplished something. But yeah, as it was, total bullshit
The Legend wrote:Maybe they wouldn't have loved to see the Rock get beat up by the Wyatts and maybe the Wyatts wouldn't get them to tune in the next night, but that doesn't mean you can't put the Rock in a situation with someone that would attract their attention by beating the crap out of the Rock. Instead of the Wyatts interrupting the Rock, why not have Kevin Owens come out, pissed off that he lost his championship? Why not have him cut a promo about how he's still going to turn it into KO-Mania and he's going to use the Rock to make a name for himself, and then actually have him break through with it? Are you telling me there's not a chance to turn Kevin Owens into a somebody that they would turn in for by showing him in a cool segment with the Rock? Cause, all anybody that only watches Mania saw Owens do was lose the IC title in a clusterfuck of a ladder match.
Are you telling me Kevin Owens couldn't have benefited from having a positive interaction with the Rock for himself?
Hanley! wrote:Why? It shows those fans that the guy that beat up the Rock is a big fucking deal. That he's a big talent and a big star and that maybe they should stick around to watch him while the Rock goes back to Hollywood. That doesn't sound to me like it defeats the purpose at all. Sounds really productive to me.
Hanley! wrote:I'm a big fan of nostalgia in the right doses but just having someone who used to do cool things in the 90s fart around doing nothing for a half hour doesn't make any part of me mark out. He was cool in the 90s because he actually did things.
...
What's interesting is that at least on this occasion, a lot of people seem to have thought this. It wasn't a small minority of fans. A lot of people thought this went too long and were ultimately turned off by it.
26 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests