Last year, I said a bunch of times that I wanted to see Rollins hold the championship for at least six months in 2015, because of how good he has become and because of all the great feuds and matches he could have as champion. Many of those matches still being relatively fresh too.
Here's a list of his possible contenders at the moment ... and these are just the obvious ones without factoring in potential face turns or anything like that: Randy Orton, John Cena, Roman Reigns, Dean Ambrose, Dolph Ziggler, Brock Lesnar AND (if he returns) Daniel Bryan.
Holy fucking shit. You could get more than a year out of these feuds without it getting tiresome if it was booked correctly. And he could be in the show-stealing match at most pay per views.
So here's my question: considering the strength of that lineup ... considering the wealth of main event opponents the company has for this guy ...
Are they really going to give Kane a title shot?
It seems to me that they're spending most of Rollins run building up a match between him and Kane at some point. Possibly for one of the bigger pay per views. And why the fuck would they feel the need to do that? I mean, it's Kane.
IT'S FUCKING KANE!
It's just ... I don't understand this company.