It is currently: Apr 27, '24, 3:06 pm

How good is Talking Smack?

Talk about what's going on in the WWE in this forum!

Moderator: Str8Shooter

How good is Talking Smack?

Postby Hanley! » Sep 29, '16, 4:22 pm

This show is so good. I had absolutely no interest in it, but watched it after that Miz segment went viral. And it's become maybe my favourite 30 minutes of wrestling related content in the week.

If anyone was on the fence about whether WWE should do away with scripted promos, this show is proof that they should. We hear all the time now that there are no good promo guys in the company these days. But Talking Smack makes it pretty damn clear that most of the Smackdown roster has real potential as characters and personalities if they're allowed to shape their characters themselves.

Miz cut a great promo a few weeks ago, but he's far from the only one. Becky was great this week. Cena was great this week. Last week Ambrose probably cut his best WWE promo. Carmella was surprisingly effective in playing up her loathsome heel character. Even Baron Corbin wasn't that bad when he was on the show. These people know how to be pro wrestlers. The company just needs to let them do it.

I like how in the course of a conversation a wrestler can randomly throw out a line that ends up feeding into a story later. This is a great forum to come up with ideas and see what works before trying stuff out on the main show, and I think they could stumble across a lot of ideas here completely by accident.

Also, the show gives the wrestlers the opportunity to fill in the gaps of a story. If a feud doesn't make much sense as it was written, the wrestlers can make a little more sense out of it on this show. Becky made a great point this week when she said people have been betraying her and targeting her all year, because they knew she was a threat. Her being betrayed all those times made her look dumb before, but she's found a way to turn it in her favour and now it makes her look dangerous instead. You see a lot of that sort of thing on the show, which appeals to me.

It's a really nice blend of reality and kayfabe - the more casual and less scripted vibe makes you take the fake storylines more seriously. It gives Smackdown a nice edge over Raw. Renee and Bryan are a good pairing too. Bryan is likable and can offer insight on the wrestlers, while Renee is just really good at her job.

Any of you who haven't really checked this out yet, I'd recommend it. The show's not going to change your life or anything, and obviously there's no actual wrestling on it. But it's a consistently fun way to spend 20-30 minutes each week.
  • 0

User avatar
Hanley! Male
World Champion
World Champion
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Topic Author
Posts: 5605
Topics: 165
Age: 37
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Reputation: 3988

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby Str8Shooter » Sep 29, '16, 5:22 pm

It's freaking amazing every week! Love the show.

It's a big test for some of the newer people too who aren't used to talking this much "in character" without a script. And Daniel Bryan doesn't go easy on them either, he's almost like a tough job interviewer at some points it feels like. He'll ask them tough questions that make them think on their feet, and he'll jump in if they say something strange and call them on it and make them defend it.

But yeah you can see how much fun some people have with the freedom they're given. Ambrose and Cena seemed to have a lot of fun the past couple weeks with the chains off.
  • 0

User avatar
Str8Shooter Male
Creative Team
Main Eventer
Main Eventer
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 3896
Topics: 359
Age: 37
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Reputation: 1477

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby DBSoT » Sep 30, '16, 9:25 am

I am not sure it was designed to be, but it is the single best story telling device that WWE has had since the brand split. Wrestlers never seem to feel the need to hold back during the interviews on talking smack. I believe the main reason it works is because it lives up to its name. It is literally a show with wrestlers talking smack about each other. You don't have the unnecessary overly scripted promos that you seem constantly on television. Instead you have one person without a full script, just venting against their opponent. Both Cena trashing Ambrose and Ambrose trashing Cena felt real and honest. Something that never seems to happen during a show like Raw. It makes the Miz-Daniel Bryan/Ziggler feud have real appeal. It started off with some real factual content and then the writers were able to apply that to in-ring. You will also notice that you don't see interviews with overly gimmicky characters (Bray, Heath, Vaudevillians, likely Cury Hawkins) and that is by design. Let the characters play out on TV or in vignettes. Keeping those characters away from Talking Smack allows the show to continue to feel legit. The closest may have been Alexa Bliss, but Bliss has committed so much to that character that it seems to have basis in reality.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
DBSoT Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 2576
Topics: 218
Age: 35
Joined: Wed Oct 9, 2013
Location: Detroit
Reputation: 851

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby SlightlyJames » Sep 30, '16, 9:32 am

DBSoT wrote:You will also notice that you don't see interviews with overly gimmicky characters (...Heath...)


Heath was on Talking Smack with Rhyno, it did seem a peculiar fit but I remember Rhyno saying some interesting stuff about why he was invested in chasing the tag titles and it was one of the main reasons I bought into their team.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
SlightlyJames Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 2994
Topics: 275
Age: 30
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Glasgow
Reputation: 1424

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby KaiserGlider » Sep 30, '16, 8:12 pm

SlightlyJames wrote:
DBSoT wrote:You will also notice that you don't see interviews with overly gimmicky characters (...Heath...)


Heath was on Talking Smack with Rhyno, it did seem a peculiar fit but I remember Rhyno saying some interesting stuff about why he was invested in chasing the tag titles and it was one of the main reasons I bought into their team.


Yeah, I think Rhyno was saying he hadn't held a tag team belt since the 90s and wanted to do it again.
  • 0

User avatar
KaiserGlider Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 2204
Topics: 472
Age: 31
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1294

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby Hanley! » Oct 01, '16, 4:55 am

Didn't he also say that he had never won tag team titles in the United States?

It's cool that the wrestlers can just go out there and come up with stuff like that to get the fans more invested in their matches. The writers for the main shows often don't manage to do that.
  • 0

User avatar
Hanley! Male
World Champion
World Champion
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Topic Author
Posts: 5605
Topics: 165
Age: 37
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Reputation: 3988

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby The Legend » Oct 01, '16, 8:50 am

The reaction to this show kind of surprises me and makes me wonder about something. People's #1 complaint about RAW recently is that three hours is too long. Now with Talking Smack, SmackDown is also three hours long basically, so the question is it really the length or is it how it is utilized?
  • 0

Image

Credit to Tim/Everlong for this awesome sig
User avatar
The Legend None specified
World Champion
World Champion
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 5641
Topics: 331
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Reputation: 1830

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby SlightlyJames » Oct 01, '16, 9:17 am

The Legend wrote:The reaction to this show kind of surprises me and makes me wonder about something. People's #1 complaint about RAW recently is that three hours is too long. Now with Talking Smack, SmackDown is also three hours long basically, so the question is it really the length or is it how it is utilized?


Well, it could be a couple of things. The main Smackdown programme is two hours long. You can just watch that if you feel that's enough and you're satisfied with that, you won't lose track of any stories and if something major goes down on Talking Smack it'll be recapped. Talking Smack is more of a supplementary show than it is an extension of Smackdown. It's a different environment, plus it's a network show so it doesn't mean watching any additional ads. However, you're right in that the core Smackdown show being so much more enjoyable is definitely a factor in making us willing to stick around for the extra half an hour of related content.
  • 0

Image
User avatar
SlightlyJames Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 2994
Topics: 275
Age: 30
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Glasgow
Reputation: 1424

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby Str8Shooter » Oct 01, '16, 11:21 am

The Legend wrote:The reaction to this show kind of surprises me and makes me wonder about something. People's #1 complaint about RAW recently is that three hours is too long. Now with Talking Smack, SmackDown is also three hours long basically, so the question is it really the length or is it how it is utilized?


Talking Smack is about 22 minutes, so really SD is 2 hrs and 22 minutes, still significantly less than Raw, which usually has a 10 minute overrun.

The thing if Raw was better people wouldn't complain as much as they do about 3 hours. Sure it still might be too long to sit and watch but it would be more worth it.
  • 0

User avatar
Str8Shooter Male
Creative Team
Main Eventer
Main Eventer
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 3896
Topics: 359
Age: 37
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Reputation: 1477

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby Hanley! » Oct 01, '16, 11:31 am

Given Talking Smack is a short show and Raw has an overrun, it's probably still 45 minutes longer than Smackdown most weeks. Which still makes a big difference.

Talking Smack is also optional. It's on the Network so you can watch it right after Smackdown, or go back to it later in the week. There's less pressure to keep watching for over two hours.

And yeah, I think the fact that it's so different helps it too. Even if it's an extension of the Smackdown show, it feels like a separate show. It's got a different vibe and a much different presentation. It doesn't feel like another half hour of more of the same.
  • 0

User avatar
Hanley! Male
World Champion
World Champion
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Topic Author
Posts: 5605
Topics: 165
Age: 37
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Reputation: 3988

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby Everlong » Oct 05, '16, 12:23 pm

Talking Smack videos are getting me interested in watching WWE (Well, Smackdown) again.

Here's the most recent one I saw with AJ STyles, Renee and Daniel Bryan:

https://streamable.com/k3a3

Fantastic promo from AJ. I loved that he called out how illogical it is to have Cena in the triple threat, haha.
  • 0

Image

Image

YOU HEARD IT FROM TAJ FIRST FOLKS
User avatar
Everlong Male
SquaredCircle Commisioner
Living Legend
Living Legend
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 10544
Topics: 2439
Age: 35
Joined: Tue Oct 8, 2013
Location: Brew City, USA
Reputation: 3827

Re: How good is Talking Smack?

Postby DBSoT » Oct 05, '16, 1:32 pm

AJ claiming that James Elseworth is more deserving of a world title shot than John Cena, was the highlight of a lifetime. :rotf
  • 0

Image
User avatar
DBSoT Male
Ring General
Ring General
 
10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership10 years of membership
 
Posts: 2576
Topics: 218
Age: 35
Joined: Wed Oct 9, 2013
Location: Detroit
Reputation: 851

 


Return to WWE

Who is Online Now?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 119 guests

Reputation System ©'